USPTO serial 78753950
RFA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RFA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J Kolegraff
William J Kolegraff LAW OFFICE OF BILL KOLEGRAFF3119 TURNBERRY WAYJAMUL, CA 91935-1650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | radio frequency enabled product identification tag for selectively controlling the utility of the product; a radio frequency enabled product identification tag for attachment to an electronic device, media, or optical disc, and capable of selectively controlling utility of the electronic device, media, or optical disc; a radio frequency enabled product identification tag for attachment to product packaging, consumer disposables, medical disposables, medical consumables, consumer consumables, consumer products, or medical products; an integrated circuit module having identifying information and a radio frequency receiver, and for selectively controlling the utility of an electronic device, media, or optical disc; a point-of-sale RFID (radio frequency ID) or NFC (near field communication) radio frequency reader; antenna for connection to a radio frequency product identification tag; a point-of-sale system having an radio frequency (RF) reader and a cooperating set of radio frequency activating integrated circuits, with each activating integrated circuit attached or coupled to a good; an authorization integrated circuit module for attachment to a good, and acting responsive to a radio frequency signal; radio frequency activation integrated circuit for integration with an electronic device, media, or optical disc | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |