USPTO serial 78758468
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Kevlin
MARY L. KEVLIN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys and sporting goods, namely, bean bag toys, foam toys, foam novelty items, namely, foam fingers, puppets; balloons, checker sets, chess sets, dominoes, cribbage game, dart boards and dart board accessories, namely, darts, dart shafts and dart flights, toy mobiles, jigsaw and manipulative puzzles, yo-yo's, toy banks, toy airplanes, inflatable baseball bats, decorative wind socks, flying discs, toy necklaces, miniature toy baseballs, footballs, softballs, playground balls, rubber action balls, golf balls, golf club head covers, golf club bags, golf putters, billiard accessories, namely, cues, billiard balls and cue cases, catcher's masks, grip tape for baseball bats, baseball batting tees, pine tar bags for baseball, rosin bags for baseball, batting gloves, baseball gloves, baseball mitts, chest protectors for sports, athletic supporters, baseball pitching machines, inflatable toys; basketball backboards and nets; hand held video and electronic games; party favors in the nature of noise makers; costume masks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |