USPTO serial 78758974
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $2,600
GLENVIEW, IL, US
GLENVIEW, IL, US
Norwood, MA, US
Glenview, IL, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley L. Cohn
Bradley L. Cohn Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geralds200 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2900Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Industrial robots, namely, robotic devices for automatically feeding test specimens in material measurement and testing systems | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
| 009 | Material measurement and testing systems, namely, electromechanical testing systems consisting primarily of testers for tensile, compression, fatigue, reverse stress, shear, flexure, peel, tear, cyclic, torsion, and bend testing; servohydraulic fatigue and static hydraulic testing systems consisting primarily of testers for tensile, compression, fatigue, fracture, shear, and bend testing; hardness testing equipment, namely, testers for measuring resistance of materials to indentation, scratching, abrasion, or cutting; impact testing equipment, namely, servohydraulic testers for measuring impact forces and material deformation; computer software for set-up and control of material measurement and testing systems, and acquisition, storage, analysis and reporting data and results of materials testing; strain gauge transducers for measuring load and strain; optical and video extensometers for contact-free measurement of material deformation; handheld and portable mechanical testing machines for tensile, compression, torsion, reverse stress, shear, flexure, peel, tear, cyclic and bend testing; torsion testing instruments, namely, testers for measuring twisting deformation of a solid body; spring testing instruments, namely, spring testers for testing coil and leaf springs in tension and compression; asphalt testing instruments, namely, direct and indirect tension testers for measuring the physical properties of asphalt binders and mixes; microelectronic testing instruments for measuring the mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of microelectronic components and devices; structural testing systems consisting primarily of testing rigs for determining the durability and integrity of sub-assemblies and complete structures in the automotive and aerospace industries; and environmental test chambers, namely, temperature controlled enclosures for temperature simulation | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
| 011 | Furnaces; environmental systems and heating systems, namely, high temperature furnaces, calibration furnaces, tube furnaces, radiant furnaces, vacuum furnaces, split furnaces, and elevating hearth furnaces; and specialized heating cabinets for commercial and industrial research of material properties and component behavior | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting seminars, workshops and on-site education programs in the field of training others in the use of material measurement and testing systems, structural testing systems and high temperature and environmental systems | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PDMS | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |