USPTO serial 78761577
TIGER BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIGER BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THE JOHN FORSYTH SHIRT COMPANY LTD.
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by THE JOHN FORSYTH SHIRT COMPANY LTD.
THE JOHN FORSYTH SHIRT COMPANY LTD.
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by THE JOHN FORSYTH SHIRT COMPANY LTD.
Mississauga, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman P. Soloway
NORMAN P. SOLOWAY HAYES SOLOWAY P.C.3450 E. SUNRISE DRIVESUITE 140TUCSON, AZ 85718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shorts, shirts, blouses, jackets, underwear, lingerie, sleepwear, sweaters, coats, dresses, skirts, sweatshirts, T-shirts, tank tops, halter tops and vests | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE JOHN FORSYTH SHIRT COMPANY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by THE JOHN FORSYTH SHIRT COMPANY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Tiger Brand Holdings Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named TIGER BRAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |