USPTO serial 78765967
GO APPETIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GO APPETIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Antoinette M. Tease
Antoinette M. Tease ANTOINETTE M. TEASE, P.L.L.C.PO Box 51016Billings, MT 51016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Vegetable-based snack food; fruit-based snack food; potato-based snack food; dairy-based chocolate food beverages; vegetable-based chocolate food beverages; fruit puree; vegetable puree; dried fruit mixes; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal-based snack foods; rice-based snack foods; wheat-based snack foods; granola-based snack bars; chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; cereal-derived ready-to-eat food bars; fruit teas; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; herbal food beverages; sorbet; frozen yogurt; frozen confections; frozen flavored waters; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; salad dressings; sauces | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices; vegetable juices; fruit-flavored drinks; iced fruit beverages; energy drinks; frozen fruit beverages; soy-based beverages not being milk substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Allegretto Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Allegretto Ventures, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GO APPETIT FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GO APPETIT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |