USPTO serial 78766579
METHOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METHOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitch Milstein
Mitch Milstein Quiksilver, Inc.15202 Graham StreetHuntington Beach, CA 92649-1109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Foodstuffs and beverages, namely, vitamin fortified beverages, meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes, and nutritional shakes for use as a meal substitute; nutritionally fortified beverages; vitamin fortified beverages; soy protein for use as a nutritional ingredient in various powdered and ready-to-drink beverages; ready to drink meal replacement drinks; dietetic beverages for medical purposes; nutritional supplements; dietary food supplements; dietary supplemental drinks; vitamin supplements; mineral supplements; and powdered nutritional supplement drink mix | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Milk-based beverages; milk-based beverage containing coffee; ready to drink dairy based protein food beverages and powdered whey or soy based protein food beverages; ready to eat food bars with a soy or whey protein base; algae food beverages, namely, seaweed drinks; drinks based on yoghurt; lactic acid bacteria drinks; nutritional powdered milk for food purposes; milk drinks containing fruits; milk based beverages containing fruit juice; ready to drink meal replacements beverages in this class; milk beverages with high milk content; soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Beverages made of coffee; beverages made of tea; cocoa beverages with milk; coffee-based beverages containing milk; herbal food beverages; nutritional powered herbal food beverages; cereal based snack foods; ready to eat cereal derived food bars; grain based food bars; bakery goods; energy bars in the nature of candy bars; rice based snack foods; granola based snack bars; wheat based snack foods; muesli based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral water; aerated water; soft drinks; pop; guarana drinks; fruit drinks; fruit juices; sports drinks; isotonic beverages; energy drinks; concentrates, syrups, powders or other preparations used in the making of beers, mineral water, aerated water, soft drinks, pop, guarana drinks, fruit drinks, fruit juices, sports drinks, isotonic drinks and energy drinks; essences for use in making beers, mineral water, aerated water, soft drinks, pop, guarana drinks, fruit drinks, fruit juices, sports drinks, isotonic drinks and energy drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quiksilver, Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Quiksilver, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named METHOD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |