USPTO serial 78774100
SHEERBLISS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHEERBLISS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew H. Swyers, ESq.
Matthew H. Swyers, ESq. The Swyers Law Firm, PLLC344 Maple Avenue West, Suite 389Vienna, VA 22180UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Blended oil; Candied fruit; Candied fruit snacks; Canned cooked meat; Canned fruits; Chocolate milk; Compotes; Condensed milk; Cooking oil; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dried fruit mixes; Dried fruits; Dried meat; Drinking yogurts; Egg nog; Egg substitute; Eggs; Fish and chips; Fish cakes; Fish croquettes; Fish fillets; Food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit; Frankfurters; Frozen eggs; Frozen fruits; Fruit and soy based snack food; Fruit chips; Fruit preserves; Fruit salads; Fruit topping; Fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; Fruit-based food beverage; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit-based spreads; Fruits preserved in alcohol; Game; Half and half; Hot dogs; Jams; Jellies; Luncheon meats; Meat; Meat jellies; Meat paste; Meat, frozen; Meat-based spreads; Milk; Milk based beverages containing fruit juice; Milk beverages containing fruits; Milk drinks containing fruits; Milk powder; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Milk-based beverage containing coffee; Oils and fats for food; Olive oil; Peanut oil; Poultry; Pre-packaged dinners consisting primarily of meat, fish, or poultry and served with pasta, rice, or vegetables; Processed meat; Processed vegetables and fruits; Salad oil; Sesame oil; Soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; Soybean milk; Soybean oil; Tuna fish; Vegetable oils; Yogurt; Yogurt-based beverages; frozen and prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SheerBliss Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SheerBliss Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SHEERBLISS ICE CREAM, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SHEERBLISS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |