USPTO serial 78780868
XOMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XOMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie K. Wade
STEPHANIE K WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP2101 L ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceuticals for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases and conditions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |