USPTO serial 78788661
DIMENSIONS OF LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIMENSIONS OF LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hartford, CT
Hartford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leah Cohen Chatinover
Leah Cohen Chatinover REID AND RIEGE, PC1 FINANCIAL PLZHARTFORD, CT 06103-2608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the field of multi-dimensional wellness improvement and the distribution of printed material in connection therewith for residents and employees of continuing care retirement communities, that inculcate the value of holistic wellness in a customized manner enabling each continuing care retirement community to advocate multi-dimensional wellness improvement in a unique way; organizing cultural arts and social functions relating to multi-dimensional wellness improvement; providing fitness and recreation activities relating to multi-dimensional wellness improvement; educational testing, namely, administering self assessment test relating to multi-dimensional wellness and self awareness | ACTIVE | Feb 5, 2004 |
| 044 | Medical services for residents of continuing care retirement communities, related to holistic and multi-dimensional wellness, namely, medical evaluation assessment services for residents receiving additional care services including assisted living, enriched living, dementia care or skilled nursing that identify needs relating to multi-dimensional wellness; providing medical assistance and consultancy services namely, care planning provided by specialized medical personnel relating to multi-dimensional wellness improvement; healthcare services, namely preventative screening services in the nature of blood pressure clinics, nutritional evaluations, and health risk | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |