USPTO serial 78791446
THE HOSTING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE HOSTING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Customer service in the nature of providing assistance to customers when they have a business problem or concern in the field of reseller web hosting, wholesaler web hosting, private label web hosting, or virtual hosting; and providing customer service in the nature of providing assistance to customers when they have a business problem or concern in the above field, such assistance being offered to third parties on behalf of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hosting websites of others on computer servers and managing those servers, also known as reseller web hosting, wholesaler web hosting, private label web hosting, or virtual hosting; and providing a website for the management of websites uploaded onto managed servers by third parties such as website designers, developers, and integrators, in the field of reseller web hosting, wholesaler web hosting, private label web hosting, or virtual hosting | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |