USPTO serial 78792939
BUSINESS INTEGRITY THROUGH EMBEDDED GOVERNANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUSINESS INTEGRITY THROUGH EMBEDDED GOVERNANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATINA C. BANKS
KATINA C. BANKS DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP370 SEVENTEENTH STREET SUITE 4700REPUBLIC PLAZA BUILDINGDENVER, CO 80202-5647Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software in the field of financial regulatory compliance, namely, software that protects corporate assets by integrating regulatory governance policies and processes with an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |