USPTO serial 78797491
OXY+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OXY+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
Thomas I. Rozsa Rozsa Law Group LC18757 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 220Tarzana, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR USE AS CLEANSING, DEODORIZING AND REFRESHENING INGREDIENTS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF MOUTH SPRAYS, MOUTHWASHES, MOUTHRINSES, AND MEDICINES FOR DENTAL PURPOSES, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR DENTAL BLEACHING GEL, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR DENTIFRICES IN THE FORM OF CHEWING GUM, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR BREATH FRESHENERS, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR BREATH MINTS, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR TOOTHPASTES, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR BREATH FRESHENING STRIPS, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR DENTAL FLOSS, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR ANTISEPTIC MOUTHWASHES, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR ANTISEPTIC PREPARATIONS, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR DISINFECTANT FOR HYGIENIC PURPOSES, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR MEDICATED LOZENGES, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR BREATH FRESHENING CHEWING GUM FOR MEDICINAL PURPOSES, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR MEDICATED MOUTH RINSE, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR MEDICATED MOUTHWASH, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR BACTERIOSTATS FOR MEDICINAL, DENTAL AND VETERINARY PURPOSES, AND CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR MEDICATED DENTAL FLOSS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |