USPTO serial 78800581
COLOR SHOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2007
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with COLOR SHOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA CLARITA, CA, US
SANTA CLARITA, CA, US
SANTA CLARITA, CA, US
SANTA CLARITA, CA, US
SANTA CLARITA, CA, US
SANTA CLARITA, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Madkour
Mark Madkour John Paul Mitchell Systems20705 Centre Pointe Parkway20705 Centre Pointe PkwySANTA CLARITA, CA 91350Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair bleach; Hair bleaching preparations; Hair care creams; Hair care preparations; Hair color; Hair color removers; Hair decolorants; Hair dyes; Hair frosts; Hair lighteners | ACTIVE | Jul 24, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks owned by JOHN PAUL MITCHELL SYSTEMS
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named COLOR SHOTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 26, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |