CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GORDON'S

USPTO serial 78803527

GORDON'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GORDON'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer J. Millones

Jennifer J. Millones DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA, INC.801 MAIN AVESIXTH FLOORNORWALK, CT 06851-1127

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, gin and vodkaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 23, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 29, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 19, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance