USPTO serial 78807984
CHEWBRUSH GUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3492678Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEWBRUSH GUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald N. Huff
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST NW THIRD FLOOR WESTWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | DENTIFRICES, NAMELY, DENTIFRICES IN THE FORM OF CHEWING GUM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | CONFECTIONERY FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, MEDICATED CHEWING GUM, PASTILLES, SWEET CANDY AND CANDY DROPS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, A DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM CONSISTING OF SPECIALLY FORMULATED MEDICATED CHEWING GUM DESIGNED TO MASK TASTE AND OPTIMALLY RELEASE ACTIVE SUBSTANCES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED CHEWING GUM, PASTILLES, SWEET CANDY AND CANDY DROPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gumlink A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Gumlink A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Gumlink A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CHEWBRUSH GUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |