USPTO serial 78808032
L'ECOLE DES FEMMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with L'ECOLE DES FEMMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumery, cosmetics, skin soaps, essential oils for personal use, hair and body lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | eyeglasses, sunglasses, eyeglass and sunglass cases, frames, cords and chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry, watches, precious metals and their alloys, and goods made made of or coated with these materials, namely, bracelets, rings, necklaces, pendants, earrings, ornamental pins, keyrings, pill boxes and candle holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | personal organizers, appointment books, diaries, personal journals, stationery, printed invitations, note paper, photo albums, desk accessories, namely, desk pads and blotters, writing instruments, wrapping paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | leather, imitations of leather, animal skins, animal hides, and goods made of these materials, namely, purses, handbags, shoulder bags, clutch bags, wallets, billfolds, credit card cases, change purses, key cases, cosmetic bags sold empty, cases and pouches sold empty, briefcases and attache cases, briefcase-type portfolios, luggage, suitcases, suit bags, trunks for traveling, duffel bags, tote bags, backpacks, overnight cases, toiletry kit bags sold empty, umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | dinnerware, namely, dishes, plates, bowls, cups, saucers and chargers, beverage glasses, mugs and tumblers, stemware, namely wine glasses, champagne flutes, goblets and martini glasses, barware, namely, corkscrews, bottle openers, champagne buckets, coolers for wine, vacuum bottles, cocktail shakers, beverage stirrers, ice buckets and ice tongs, pitchers, decanters, serving platters and trays not of precious metal, trivets, candy dishes, tea pots not of precious metal, sugar bowls, creamers, salt and pepper shakers and mills, serving utensils, namely, pie servers and spatulas, cookware, namely, pots, pans, casserole dishes, baking dishes, cookie sheets and ramekins, non-electric coffee pots not of precious metal and tea kettles, vases, candle holders not of precious metal, soap dishes, toothbrush holders, storage canisters, waste baskets, shoe horns, combs, hair brushes, nail brushes, clothing brushes | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | textiles and textile goods, namely, table cloths, table linens, placemats, napkins, bed linens, bed sheets, bed spreads, pillows, blankets, quilts, comforters, duvets, beach blankets, towels, wash cloths, handkerchiefs, curtains, drapery | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, dresses, skirts, pants, jeans, capris, shorts, blouses, shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jogging suits, warm-up suits, suits, blazers, vests, jackets, coats, rainwear, capes, ponchos, neckware, scarves, shawls, belts, gloves, bathing suits, beach cover-ups, robes, nightgowns, pajamas, lingerie, underwear and hosiery, footwear, namely, shoes, boots, sandals and slippers, headwear, namely, hats, visors and head scarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail clothing stores, retail stores featuring clothing, mail order catalog services featuring clothing, on-line retail store services featuring clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Laura Sfez
- Other trademarks owned by Laura Sfez
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named L'ECOLE DES FEMMES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |