Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78808190?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78808190. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns INDIVIDUAL COMBAT SYSTEMS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78808190, the listed owner(s) include: Sarcos Investments LC.

What is USPTO serial number 78808190?

Serial number 78808190 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark INDIVIDUAL COMBAT SYSTEMS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of INDIVIDUAL COMBAT SYSTEMS?

INDIVIDUAL COMBAT SYSTEMS (78808190) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover INDIVIDUAL COMBAT SYSTEMS?

The public record lists International Classes: 007, 009, 010, 012. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: INDIVIDUAL COMBAT SYSTEMS Serial# 78808190 | status 601; last event MAB1 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDIVIDUAL COMBAT SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Sarcos Investments LC
Salt Lake City, UT
Other trademarks owned by Sarcos Investments LC

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
007	Unmanned mobile industrial robots for use in transporting and moving objects, and performing inspections and other useful tasks	ACTIVE	—
009	Robotic man amplifier systems, namely robotic exoskeleton suits worn by humans for the purpose of enhancing the strength and endurance of the person wearing the suit: Individual amplification systems, namely robotic exoskeleton suits worn by persons in hazardous and dangerous environments for enhancing the endurance and strength of the person wearing the suit, and providing protection from chemical, biological and nuclear threats; Computers and computer peripherals for presenting virtual reality by simulating a visual and/or tactile environment to a human being; unmanned mobile robots for personal use; unmanned mobile robots for personal, military and public safety use for use in transporting and moving objects, and performing inspections and other useful tasks	ACTIVE	—
010	Medical apparatus for attachment to the body for measuring vital signs of a human	ACTIVE	—
012	Automatic guided unmanned ground vehicles; automatic guided unmanned ground vehicles for use in transporting and moving objects, and performing inspections and other useful tasks	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 12, 2007	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Dec 12, 2007	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Nov 2, 2007	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Oct 10, 2007	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Sep 17, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Sep 17, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Sep 17, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Sep 14, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 14, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 14, 2007	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Mar 14, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 15, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 19, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 19, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 10, 2006	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—

INDIVIDUAL COMBAT SYSTEMS