CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for 1947 BEER

USPTO serial 78809085

1947 BEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 1947 BEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Pens; pencils; calendars; stationery; coasters made of paper; printed paper signs; posters; stickers; books in the field of beer and cookbooksACTIVE—
021Mugs; shot glasses; bar runners, namely, a long, narrow strip of rubber placed on a bar to absorb liquids; coolers, namely, portable beverage coolersACTIVE—
025Hats; t-shirts; jackets; shirts; sweatshirts; sweat pants; fleeces, namely, fleece pullovers, fleece jackets, fleece hats and fleece shorts; wrist bands; headbandsACTIVE—
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, beerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance