USPTO serial 78809602
SUPERPLAY USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3409082Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2008
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERPLAY USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
FRANK ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC
JUPITER, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing a family entertainment and amusement center featuring bowling, laser tag, batting cages, miniature golf, arcade games, billiards, go-carts, birthday parties and celebrations, corporate parties and celebrations, children's games, and family shows and activities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 17, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frank Investments, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Frank Investments, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Frank Investments, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FRANK ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SUPERPLAY USA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2007 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |