USPTO serial 78809979
WHEEL BUGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WHEEL BUGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Signal Hill, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin P Steinman
435 S DETROIT ST APT 304LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-6401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Bath toys; Battery operated action toys; Bendable toys; Caps for toy pistols; Cases for toy structures; Cases for toy vehicles; Children's activity tables containing manipulative toys which convert to easels; Children's multiple activity toys; Children's wire construction and art activity toys; Clockwork toys ; Clockwork toys ; Collectable toy figures; Construction toys; Disc toss toys; Electric action toys; Electric toy train transformers; Electronic toy building blocks that light up as a night light; Electronically operated toy motor vehicles; Fantasy character toys; Flying saucers ; Inflatable toys; Lever action toys; Mechanical action toys; Mechanical toys; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Molded toy figures; Music box toys; Musical toys; Non-riding transportation toys; Plastic character toys; Positionable toy figures; Pull toys; Push toys; Radio controlled toy vehicles; Ride-on toys; Rubber character toys; Sandbox toys; Sketching toys; Soft sculpture plush toys; Soft sculpture toys; Squeeze toys; Stacking toys; Stuffed toy animals; Stuffed toys; Talking toys; Tossing disc toys; Toy action figures; Toy action figures and accessories therefor; Toy airplanes; Toy animals and accessories therefore; Toy boxes; Toy building blocks; Toy building blocks capable of interconnection; Toy construction blocks; Toy construction sets; Toy figures; Toy furniture; Toy gliders; Toy houses; Toy mobiles; Toy model cars; Toy model hobbycraft kits; Toy model kit cars; Toy model train sets; Toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as units; Toy modeling dough; Toy noisemakers; Toy record players; Toy rockets; Toy scooters; Toy trains and parts and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles; Toy vehicles and accessories therefor; Toy vehicles with transforming parts; Toy watches; Toy weapons; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Transforming robotic toy vehicles; Transforming robotic toys; Water squirting toys; Wind-up toys; Wind-up walking toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |