USPTO serial 78814536
SH'ZEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SH'ZEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottery, Western Cape, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Anderson
STEPHEN L ANDERSON ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES32605 HWY 79 S STE 208TEMECULA, CA 92592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After sun creams; After-shave creams; After-shave emulsions; Age spot reducing creams; Anti-aging cream; Anti-wrinkle creams; Aromatherapy creams; Baby powder; Bath beads; Bath crystals; Bath gels; Bath lotion; Bath oils; Bath powder; Beauty creams for nail, hand and foot care, Body powder; Cleansing creams; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cream soaps; Cuticle cream; Exfoliate creams for cuticles, hands and feet; Emulsions for hands and feet; Foot powder; Hand creams; Nail cream; Non-medicated foot cream; Shaving creams; Sun creams; Toners and Washing and soaking preparations for cuticles, hands and feet | ACTIVE | Nov 26, 2001 |
| 005 | Anti-fungal creams for medical use; Antiseptic preparations; Corn and callus creams; Fungal medications; Medicated foot powder; Mixed vitamin preparations and vitamin supplements for nails; Nail fungus treatment preparations | ACTIVE | Nov 26, 2001 |
| 008 | Manicure implements, namely, non-electric nail buffers, emery boards, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors, and hoof sticks in the nature of cuticle pushers; Manicure sets; Nail buffers; Nail clippers; Nail files; Nail scissors; Pedicure implements, namely, non-electric nail buffers, emery boards, nail files, nail clippers, cuticle pushers, tweezers, nail and cuticle scissors, and hoof sticks in the nature of cuticle pushers; Pedicure sets | ACTIVE | Nov 11, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |