USPTO serial 78816451
THE NEXT WAVE IN RECYCLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE NEXT WAVE IN RECYCLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Plastic storage containers for domestic use for curbside collection of organic materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | promotional services in the nature of promoting public awareness of recycling programs for organic materials, and promoting the recycling programs of others for organic materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |