CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EVOLUTION

USPTO serial 78818223

EVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Stringham

JOHN C STRINGHAM WORKMAN NYDEGGER1000 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnetically encoded cards, namely, credit cards and debit cardsACTIVE—
036Financial services in the fields of credit card, debit card, and electronic funds transfer services; providing online computer services of a financial nature, namely providing searchable financial databases for obtaining financial informationACTIVE—
041Computer services in the form of on-line publication of reviews and articles featuring financial information; educational services, namely, conducting classes and seminars in the field of consumer creditACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 27, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 22, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance