USPTO serial 78824189
INFUZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFUZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Brooke
ROBERT L BROOKE TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPBANK OF AMERICA600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Exercise equipment, namely weight lifting machines, treadmills, exercise weights, barbells, and dumbbells; yoga mats; stationary exercise bicycles; weight lifting benches and bench accessories; exercise equipment namely, slant boards; exercise platforms; exercise machines; exercise benches; jump ropes; wrist and ankle weights for exercise; aerobic steps; exercise trampolines; hand grip exercisers; resistance bands for exercise; machines and equipment for physical and gymnastic/sports exercises, for muscle training and rehabilitation and for aerobic and cardiovascular exercise, namely, step simulators, rowing machines and cycle simulators; manually operated athletic exercise equipment for use in the fields of football, baseball, softball, basketball, soccer, running and volleyball to facilitate training for speed, strength, agility and quickness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |