USPTO serial 78825471
PHILLYNOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4043486Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2011
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PHILLYNOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn A. Gundersen
GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT LLPCIRA CTR 2929 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | periodicals, namely, columns in the fields of news, current events, entertainment, the arts, and topics of general interest | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 12, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by REVIEW PUBLISHING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named PHILLYNOW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 27, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |