USPTO serial 78826554
FLAMESAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLAMESAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
WILLIAM J SEITER SEITER & CO220 26TH ST STE 202SANTA MONICA, CA 90402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | spun laced fabrics for textile use; bed linen; bed spreads; bed blankets; cotton fabric; fabric furniture covers; curtains made of textile fabrics; plastic curtains; flannel; jersey material fabric; knitted fabrics; textile linings for garments; mattress covers; bed sheets; upholstery fabrics; woolen cloth; woolen fabric, woven textile fabrics; coated fabrics and laminated fabrics; filters made of textile materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | aprons; bathrobes; camisoles; gloves; hoods; jackets; knitwear; overalls; pajamas; pants; pullovers; socks; suspenders; t-shirts; underclothes; underwear; perspiration absorbent underwear; uniforms; waterproof jackets and pants; headgear, namely, hats, caps, and balaclavas | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |