USPTO serial 78829006
INTELLIGENT LABEL TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3243163Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2007
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT LABEL TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC SENSORS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC SENSORS FOR TRACKING AND CONTROL OF INVENTORY; ELECTRONIC SENSORS, NAMELY, ENCODED LABELS, TAGS AND DETECTORS THAT ARE ELECTRONICALLY RESPONSIVE FOR TRACKING AND CONTROL OF INVENTORY; CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SENSORS, NAMELY, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SENSORS FOR DETECTING THE FRESHNESS OF FOOD PRODUCTS; CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SENSORS NAMELY, ENCODED LABELS, TAGS AND DETECTORS THAT ARE CHEMICALLY AND BIOLOGICALLY RESPONSIVE THAT MEASURE THE FRESHNESS OF FOOD PRODUCTS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2005 |
| 016 | LABELS AND TAGS, NAMELY, SECURITY LABELS THAT ARE ELECTRONICALLY RESPONSIVE FOR INVENTORY TRACKING AND CONTROL; SECURITY LABELS THAT ARE CHEMICALLY AND BIOLOGICALLY RESPONSIVE FOR MEASURING THE FRESHNESS OF FOOD PRODUCTS; ENCODED FILMS AND ENCODED PACKAGING FOR TRACKING AND CONTROL OF INVENTORY | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Avery Dennison Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Avery Dennison Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT LABEL TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |