USPTO serial 78831131
TIGER TIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3385443Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2008
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIGER TIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TIGER INDUSTRIAL GROUP CO., LTD
FUAN, FUJIAN PROVINCE, CN
TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
Hollywood, FL
Other trademarks owned by TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
Hollywood, FL
Other trademarks owned by TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
Hollywood, FL
Other trademarks owned by TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Diesel engine for machines; gasoline engine not for land vehicles; Engines and motors for the generation of electricity; Engines and motors not for land vehicles; electric generators; electric polishing machines and apparatus, namely, polishing machines for use in grinding and polishing metal, wood, ceramics and plastics; dynamos; speed regulators for machines, engines and motors; starters for motors and engines; Electric pumps for machines, engines, or motors; Gas engines for the generation of electricity; Gas engines not for land vehicles; Agricultural machines, namely, sowers, motorized cultivators, crop atomizers; self-propelled road sweeping machines; Vehicle cleaning installations, namely, electrically operated cleaning brushes, being parts of a machine; washing apparatus, namely, machines for cleaning surfaces using high pressure water; electric cleaning machines and apparatus, namely, carpet cleaning machines; garbage disposals; snow ploughs; dust exhausting installations for cleaning purpose, namely, dust collector; multi-purpose high-pressure washing machines; disintegrators used in agricultural products processing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIGER INDUSTRIAL GROUP CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TIGER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION U.S.A., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named TIGER TIGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 19, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |