Drawing for CRICKET THE COOK

USPTO serial 78831323

CRICKET THE COOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRICKET THE COOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jose Martinez, Jr.

JOSE MARTINEZ JR MARTINEZ LAW325 E 41ST ST #305NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Audio recording and production, Book and review publishing, Charitable services, namely, providing training in the field of teaching children how to cook, Conducting educational exhibitions in the nature of teaching children how to cook, Education in the field of teaching children how to cook rendered through correspondence courses, Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on-line, dvd and video, and any format now known or hereafter known featuring teaching children how to cook, Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of teaching children how to cook, Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a Cricket the Cook Entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of teaching children how to cook via a global computer network, Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties related to teaching children how to cook Entertainment services in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of children's entertainment related to teaching children how to cook, Entertainment Services namely providing a website featuring, photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring teaching children how to cook, Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications related to teaching children how to cook, Personal coaching services in the field of teaching children how to cook, Production of radio and television programs related to teaching children how to cook, Production of sound and music video recordings related to teaching children how to cook, Production of video discs and tapes related to teaching children how to cook, Publication of printed matter related to teaching children how to cook.ACTIVEAug 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 9, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 8, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Nov 9, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Nov 7, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 15, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 19, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 15, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance