USPTO serial 78831450
PODSAFE MUSIC NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PODSAFE MUSIC NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew B. Katz
ANDREW B. KATZ CHERNOW KATZ LLC721 DRESHER ROADSUITE 1100HORSHAM, PA 19044Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission of music audio and music video files via the Internet | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |