USPTO serial 78835535
GOLDENSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3552001Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2008
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOLDENSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sepehr Daghighian
Sepehr Daghighian LAW OFFICE OF SEPEHR DAGHIGHIAN, P.C.433 North Camden DriveFourth FloorBeverly Hills, CA 90210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, FILES; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, HAMMERS; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, PUNCHES; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, RATCHET WRENCHES; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, HEX WRENCHES, SCRAPERS, PUNCHERS, SANDERS, PLIERS, RATCHET WRENCH SETS, SOCKET SETS, PRY BARS, CLAMPS; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, AUTOMOBILE SHEET METAL DENT REPAIR TOOL; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, SANDERS; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, SOCKET WRENCHES; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, VICES; HAND-HELD TOOLS, NAMELY, CHISELS; HAND-OPERATED RIVETING TOOLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ghorbanikhah, Mahmoud
- Other trademarks owned by GHORBANI, MIKE
- Other trademarks owned by GHORBANI, MIKE
- Other trademarks owned by Ghorbanikhah, Mahmoud
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named GOLDENSTAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 23, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |