USPTO serial 78842826
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Manhattan Beach, CA
MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Hyman
JONATHAN A HYMAN KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Raising funds for environmental clean up and conservation, environmental awareness, and environmental education; charitable fund raising for environmental clean up and conservation; educational services in the field of environment, environmental protection and environmental issues, pollution and conservation; developing educational manuals and materials in the fields of environment, environmental protection and environmental issues, pollution and conservation, community relations and participation, communications and public relations, corporate outreach and partnering and nonprofit management; providing educational demonstrations, information, assistance and advice in the field of environmental education, organization of events for educational and cultural purposes in order to sensitize people about environmental problems; providing on-line information and news in the field of environmental education; conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops, and programs in the field of the environment, environmental protection and environmental issues, pollution and conservation and distributing printed and audio-visual course materials in connection therewith; certification that authorized institutions, companies, corporations, commercial enterprises, and organizations have met certain environmental standards and support environmental education, conservation, protection, and causes; certification that authorized institutions, companies, corporations, commercial enterprises, and organizations have established standards, procedures and policies for environmental education, conservation, and protection; accreditation services for environmental policies featuring accreditation of capabilities in the following areas: adoption of contemporary and responsible environmental standards and support of environmental education, conservation, and protection | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |