Drawing for AIRPAX

USPTO serial 78845162

AIRPAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRPAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Schuman, Esq.

DAVID J SCHUMAN ESQ CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INCLAW DEPT469 N HARRISON STPRINCETON, NJ 08543-5297

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003carpet cleaners, stain removers, laundry detergents, laundry bleaches, fabric softeners; carpet cleaner with deodorizer, upholstery cleaning preparations, fabric refreshers; laundry additives for freshening fabrics; all-purpose cleaners, potpourri, aromatherapy oils used in electrical scent dispensersACTIVE
005air and room deodorizers; air freshening preparations; carpet deodorizers, room deodorants; carpet fresheners and odor eliminators, odor neutralizing preparations for use on carpets, textiles, fabrics, upholstery and clothing; deodorizers for upholstery and fabric; sanitizers for household use; all purpose disinfectantsACTIVE
011Electrically-operated units for dispensing aromatherapy oils; electrically powered devices for air freshening and deodorizing; portable electric fans; air freshening, air purification, room deodorizing and fragrance dispensing units for automotive and household use, comprising an electrically powered fan and a refillable cartridge, an air filter and air freshening fragrance, and parts and components thereforeACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 11, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Mar 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance