USPTO serial 78845476
BECHELLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BECHELLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian S. Steinberger
BRIAN S STEINBERGER LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN S STEINBERGER PA101 BREVARD AVECOCOA, FL 32922-7904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services and online store and catalog services featuring men's clothing, namely, dress shirts, shirts, sport shirts, polo type shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, sweaters, vests, suits, coats, parkas, rain suits, jackets, pants, work pants, slacks, over-alls, jeans, shorts, cummerbunds, suspenders, scarves, shoes, socks, collars, ties, neckties, belts, hats, caps, gloves, robes, sleep wear, pajamas, underwear, hosiery, athletic wear, namely, sweat pants, sweat shirts, baseball shirts, sport shirts, sweat shorts, track suits, jogging suits, running shorts, walking shorts, swim wear, bandanas, sun visors, and sweat bands, and footwear, namely dress shoes, casual shoes, boots, ski boots, snowboard boots athletic shoes, sport shoes, hiking shoes, trekking shoes, sneakers, slippers, sandals, and clogs; mail, telephone and facsimile order catalog services featuring men's clothing, namely, dress shirts, shirts, sport shirts, polo type shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, sweaters, vests, suits, coats, parkas, rain suits, jackets, pants, work pants, slacks, overalls, jeans, shorts, cummerbunds, suspenders, scarves, shoes, socks, collars, ties, neckties, belts, hats, caps, gloves, robes, sleep wear, pajamas, underwear, hosiery, athletic wear, namely, sweat pants, sweat shirts, baseball shirts, sport shirts, sweat shorts, track suits, jogging suits, running shorts, walking shorts, swim wear, bandanas, sun visors, and sweat bands, and footwear, namely dress shoes, casual shoes, boots, ski boots, snowboard boots athletic shoes, sport shoes, hiking shoes, trekking shoes, sneakers, slippers, sandals, and clogs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |