USPTO serial 78848057
ISPACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISPACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie K. Wade
STEPHANIE K WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 EYE ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging systems comprised of a magnetic resonance imaging magnet, tracks on which the magnetic resonance imaging magnet moves, and magnetic resonance imaging magnet controls; operating room tables, and structural parts therefor; head fixation frames to keep a patient's head fixed in position during surgery and magnetic resonance imaging scans; and computer software and electronic controls sold as a unit with the intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging systems that permit the integration and control of all equipment utilized in a surgical suite containing an intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging system | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation and maintenance of magnetic resonance imaging systems and operating room tables | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | integration services in the nature of installation of computer software that allows magnetic resonance imaging systems to be integrated into surgical suites with all other equipment that may be installed and/or used in a surgical suite | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |