USPTO serial 78850361
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN CLEMENTE, CA
SAN CLEMENTE, CA
SAN CLEMENTE, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES G. O'NEILL
James G. O'Neill Klein, O'Neill & SIngh, LLP43 Corporate Park, Suite 204Irvine, CA 92606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | NECKLACES, RINGS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2006 |
| 025 | CLOTHING AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, JACKETS, HATS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, BELTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2006 |
| 026 | BELT BUCKLES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, HAIR BARRETTES AND HAIR CLIPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 14, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |