USPTO serial 78850499
LOTUS-EFFECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3561156Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOTUS-EFFECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STUEHLINGEN, DE
STUEHLINGEN, DE
Bonn, DE
Bonn, DE
Bonn, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Automobile cleaners, automobile polishes, automobile waxes; preparations for cleaning, protecting and preserving vehicle surfaces; household cleaning preparations; cleaning preparations for industrial purposes, namely, general purpose cleaning and polishing liquids and powders, glass cleaning preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STO AG
- Other trademarks owned by STO SE & CO. KGAA
- Other trademarks owned by Wilhelm Barthlott
- Other trademarks owned by Wilhelm Barthlott
- Other trademarks owned by Wilhelm Barthlott
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LOTUS-EFFECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 28, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |