USPTO serial 78863273
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven E. Machat, Esq.
STEVEN E MACHAT ESQ DOWD & MAROTTA LLC277 BROADWAY STE 1310NEW YORK, NY 10007-2013UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 1998 |
| 008 | Mallets | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 1998 |
| 009 | Audio recordings featuring musical frequencies and tones | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 1998 |
| 010 | Apparatus for vibrational therapy, namely, tuning forks | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 1998 |
| 016 | Books in the field of spiritual sounds and healing therapy | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 1998 |
| 018 | Carrying cases | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 1998 |
| 020 | Pillows | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 1998 |
| 021 | Bowls; Candle holders not of precious metal; Glass and ceramic beads that are not used in the manufacture of jewelry | ACTIVE | Jan 16, 1998 |
| 025 | Jackets; Kimonos; Pants; Shawls; Silk scarves | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |