USPTO serial 78864253
WIN THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIN THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles F. Hauff, Jr.
Damon L. Boyd SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E. Van BurenPhoenix, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer games, namely, video game software, video game disks, video game cartridges, video game cassettes; desktop computer game software, desktop computer game disks, desktop computer game cartridges, desktop computer game cassettes; pre-recorded CD-ROMs featuring computer games; slot machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Hand-held unit for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, on-going television programs featuring games and entertainment in the nature of a television series game show and live-action television shows; production, syndication and rental of television programs, films, animated films, and sound and video recordings; production and distribution of television programs, films and animated films; rental of slot machines; organization, production and presentation of sporting and gaming competitions, contests, exhibitions, and quizzes concerning non-business subjects; organization, production and presentation of concerts, live performances, music concerts, live music performances, musical reviews; music publishing; record production; electronic game services provided by means of the Internet; reservation and booking services for concerts, theatre, shows, and cinema tickets; ticket information services for entertainment events; providing online computer games; information and advisory services relating to all of the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Reuben B. Klamer Living Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Reuben B. Klamer Living Trust
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WIN THE WORLD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |