USPTO serial 78868495
CONDITION SPECIFIC FORMULAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2008
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CONDITION SPECIFIC FORMULAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PORTLAND, OR
MOUNTAIN PEAK NUTRITIONALS, LLC
PORTLAND, OR
MOUNTAIN PEAK NUTRITIONALS, LLC
PORTLAND, OR
MOUNTAIN PEAK NUTRITIONALS, LLC
PORTLAND, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Ford
Susan Ford Res Nova Law4110 SE Hawthorne Blvd #326Portland, OR 97214UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GMB Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MOUNTAIN PEAK NUTRITIONALS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MOUNTAIN PEAK NUTRITIONALS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MOUNTAIN PEAK NUTRITIONALS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CONDITION SPECIFIC FORMULAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2021 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 5, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 29, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |