USPTO serial 78873030
I SEATTLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3804927Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2010
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with I SEATTLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beaverton, OR
Beaverton, OR
Beaverton, OR
Vancouver, WA
Surprise, OR
Surprise, OR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-Shirts, Sweat Shirts, Bandanas, Baseball Caps, Beachwear, Beanies, Boxer Briefs, Boxer Shorts, Briefs, Caps, Coats, Denim Jackets, Fleece Pullovers, Footwear, Gym Shorts, Gym Suits, Hats, Head Bands, Headwear, Jackets, Jeans, Jogging Suits, Lingerie, Pants, Polo Shirts, Sandals, Sarongs, Shorts, Skirts, Sneakers, Sun Visors, Sweat Pants, Sweat Shorts, Sweat Suits, Sweaters, Sweat Socks, Swim Trunks, Swim Wear, Tank Tops, Thermal Underwear, T-Shirts, Underpants, Undershirts, Underwear, Visors, Warm Up Suits and Footwear | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wilkinson, Karen, R.
- Other trademarks owned by Wilkinson, Karen, R.
- Other trademarks owned by Wilkinson, Karen, R.
- Other trademarks owned by Marley, Kevin, M
- Other trademarks owned by Marley, Kevin, M
- Other trademarks owned by Marley, Kevin, M
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named I SEATTLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |