USPTO serial 78878382
VELENO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VELENO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South Gate, CA
South Gate, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J DAY
CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY301 E BETHANY HOME RDSUITE A213PHOENIX, AZ 85012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S AND WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, PANTS, POLO SHIRTS, HATS, BEANIES, SHORTS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, SHOES, AND BELTS | ABANDONED | May 4, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |