USPTO serial 78882695
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sergei Orel
Sergei Orel Baker and Rannells PA92 East Main StreetSuite 302Somerville, NJ 08876| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMES, EAU DE COLOGNE, EAU DE TOILETTE; COSMETICS, NAMELY LOOSE FACE POWDER, PRESSED FACE POWDER, FOUNDATION MAKE-UP, LIPSTICKS, EYE SHADOW, BLUSHER, MASCARA, EYELINER, EYE PENCILS, LIP PENCILS, LIP BALM, LIP GLOSS, LIPSTICK; FACIAL MOISTURIZING SKIN CREAM, BODY MOISTURIZING SKIN CREAM, CLEANSING CREAM; BODY LOTION, FACE LOTION, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, HAIR SHAMPOOS, HAIR CONDITIONER AND HAIR RINSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SUNGLASSES, EYEGLASSES, EYEGLASS FRAMES AND EYEGLASS CASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | JEWELRY, CLOCKS AND WATCHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, KEY CASES, BACKPACKS, FANNY PACKS; LUGGAGE AND UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, namely, DRESSES, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, JACKETS, PANTS, SHIRTS, SUITS, BLAZERS, PULLOVERS, CARDIGANS, OVERALLS AND SOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |