Drawing for INTERTEKCONNECT

USPTO serial 78883506

INTERTEKCONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERTEKCONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Verstrate, Scott L. Glickson, Michael T. Hepburn, Derek A. Roach, Bradley A. Salmon, George R. Spatz, Kenneth K. Dort, John W. Burke, III, Mary Dalton Baril, Janet P. Peyton, Robin C. Vance

CHRISTOPHER J. VERSTRATE MCGUIREWOODS LLPSUITE 410077 W. WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60601-1683

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consumer product safety testing and consultationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Feb 10, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 9, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2008CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 19, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 6, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 6, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 4, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 4, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 11, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 25, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 20, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance