USPTO serial 78884869
NEWMOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEWMOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Felber, Jr.
ROBERT P. FELBER, JR. WALLER LANSDEN DORTCH & DAVIS, LLP511 UNION STREETSUITE 2700NASHVILLE, TN 37219-8966Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | BACON; SLICED PORK; BARBECUED PORK; PORK FLOSS; PRESERVED MEATS; SAUSAGES; PROCESSED OR PRESERVED PEAS; PROCESSED ANCHOVIES; PROCESSED SATAY FISH, NOT LIVE; PRESERVED CUTTLEFISH; PROCESSED SEAWEED; PRESERVED MUSHROOMS; PROCESSED MEAT; COOKED MEAT; SLICED MEAT, SLICED BEEF, SLICED CHICKEN, SLICED FISH; BARBECUED MEAT, BARBECUED BEEF, BARBECUED CHICKEN, BARBECUED FISH; MEAT FLOSS, BEEF FLOSS, CHICKEN FLOSS, FISH FLOSS; DRIED PORK; GRILLED PORK; MINCED PORK; SHREDDED PORK; TINNED MEATS; SALTED MEATS; FOOD PRODUCTS MADE FROM FISH, NAMELY, SMOKED FISH AND FISH PASTE; FOODS PREPARED FROM FISH, NAMELY, PICKLED FISH; SALMON, NOT LIVE; PRESERVED FISH; SALTED FISH; SARDINES; PRESERVED ONIONS; PICKLES; SAUERKRAUT | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | FARINA; CEREALS AND PREPARATIONS MADE FROM CEREALS, NAMELY, BREAKFAST CEREALS; RICE; PREPARATIONS MADE FROM RICE, NAMELY, PUFFED RICE, INSTANT PORRIDGE; FLOUR, PASTRY POWDER, NAMELY, BAKING POWDER; SAUCES, NAMELY, HOT SAUCE, BBQ SAUCE, MUSTARD SAUCE, CHILI SAUCE, TOMATO SAUCE, SWEET AND SOUR SAUCE; VINEGAR; CONDIMENTS, NAMELY, PICKLED GINGER; SPICES; NOODLES; INSTANT NOODLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS, NAMELY, SOFT DRINKS, POWDERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF EFFERVESCING SOFT DRINKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goh Joo Hin Pte Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Goh Joo Hin Pte Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NEWMOON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 9, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |