Drawing for FLIGHTS MADE SIMPLE

USPTO serial 78884943

FLIGHTS MADE SIMPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIGHTS MADE SIMPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Guida

THOMAS A GUIDA BAKER & HOSTETLER1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in accessing and managing travel-related information, such as airline flight and lodging information, and other travel related services and destination information from public and private communications networks and reservations systems; computer software for managing travel-related information systems and networks, including computers, databases, software and networks used to search for information, make reservations, and process payments from travelers and to travel services providers; and prerecorded cd-roms featuring travel informationACTIVE
039Travel agency services in the fields of transportation, namely providing travel information, including real-time transportation and carrier availability information obtained directly from, and making reservations and bookings for transportation using public and private sources such as the global computer network, by means of a web site; and vacation travel packages featuring transportationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 7, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance