Drawing for TIS

USPTO serial 78885208

TIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Paskar

Mark A. Paskar BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-3300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Candy; cocoa; coffee; tea; cocoa-based beverages containing milk; coffee-based beverages containing milk; tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; beverages made of tea; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; corn starch based drinks, in the nature of a food beverage consisting primarily of maize and porridge; grain-based beverages, herbal food beverages; flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; flavorings for beverages; scented water for flavoring beverages; cereal-based snack foods; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; extruded corn snacks; extruded wheat snacks; granola snacks; granola-based snack bars; puffed corn snacks; rice-based snack foods; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; crackers; chocolate covered nuts; popcorn; tortilla chips; pita chips; corn chips; chocolate chipsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 22, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 4, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jul 22, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 15, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 1, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance