Drawing for NUTRICOGNIA

USPTO serial 78885272

NUTRICOGNIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUTRICOGNIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dor Cohen Zedek

DOR COHEN ZEDEK PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER LLP1500 BROADWAY FL 12NEW YORK, NY 10036-4055UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industry and science; diagnostic preparations other than for medical or veterinary purposes; diagnostic preparations for scientific or research useACTIVE
005Biological and chemical preparations and reagents, namely, preparations of extracts, assays, nucleic acids, proteins, polypeptides, and antibodies and molecular arrays of biological materials for medical use; diagnostic test kits comprised of reagents, processing chemicals, slides and biochips for medical useACTIVE
009Laboratory instruments, namely, shakers, incubators, laboratory baths, slide centrifuges, slide driers, glass driers, ovens; computer programs for laboratory instrument control; data processors; scanners; computer hardware and computer software used for analysis of food, feed and beverageACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 26, 2007ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2007ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Nov 23, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 23, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 23, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Nov 21, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 15, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 15, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance