Drawing for AMAZION

USPTO serial 78885400

AMAZION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMAZION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joe McKinney Muncy

JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCHPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio Amplifier; Power Management Integrated Circuits; LED Driver Integrated Circuits; Audio Processing Chips; Thin Film Transistor-Liquid Crystal Display Driving Integrated Circuits; image processing chips; semiconductor chips; silicon chips; semiconductors; integrated circuits; microprocessors; liquid crystal displays; liquid crystal module; video processors; television monitors; video monitors; and television setsACTIVE
042Research and design in the area of semiconductor processing technology; technical consultancy in relation to the production of semiconductors; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; design for others of integrated circuits and integrated circuit cores for use in wireless communications and wireless communication equipments and apparati and digital signal processors; research, design, services and consultancy in semiconductors, integrated circuits, video processors, tuners, and display devices for othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
May 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance