Drawing for PROSTART

USPTO serial 78885428

PROSTART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROSTART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wm. Charles Saunders

Wm. Charles Saunders AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP1800 Concord PikeOW2Wilmington, DE 19850

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and video recordings, namely, pre-recorded compact discs, audio tapes, audio tape cassettes, video tapes, video discs and CD-ROMs, all featuring information about prostate cancer; computer software featuring information for calculating risk of developing prostate cancerACTIVE
041Educational training services, namely, arranging and conducting conferences, seminars, courses and workshops, all relating to prostate cancer, and consultation provided in connection therewith; providing online non-downloadable electronic publications, namely, brochures, newsletters, and magazines, all featuring information about prostate cancerACTIVE
042Medical research and development, relating to the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancerACTIVE
044providing information relating to the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer, via web sites on the Internet; providing medical counseling related to prostate cancerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 14, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 23, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance